Note: Super minibot test run with PTC

Well, ran a 2.5 lb minibot with the Tetrix PTC  and 10 ft of extension wire…  Time was about 2.5 seconds.  It should have been around 1.25 seconds according to my simulation.   So I can match 2.5 second time in the simulation with 10v battery voltage rather than 14v.     I suspect the resistance of the PTCs , battery and the wire resistance is creating a substantial voltage drop.    The PTCs have a resistance between .05 and .14  ohms with a typical of .1 ohms.  This was confirmed by an ohm meter with the PTC cool.  The wire is 18 or 20 gauge and has a measured resistance of .3 ohms round trip.

The motor resistance is 1.6 ohms and these are in parallel with an effective resistance of .8 ohms.   So we would expect a voltage divider ratio of  .8/(.8+.1 + .3) = .75.   which means motor only gets 14*.75 = 10.5v driving it.    When I run this in the simulation I get a 2.2 sec climb.

If we add the resistance of the battery (unknown) it might add another 50 to 100 mohms and then the results would match better.

So, I am confident that we will see the expected times when the final wiring is done and doesn’t use the ptc’s.       I will do a test with the PTC’s under a 2.5 second current load for 2 seconds and see how much the resistance increases when the PTC has heated up a bit.

We may decide to run the competition with the PTC’s inserted just to be safe.

More minibot:


Note: Minibot current calculation vs battery voltage

Minibot Model


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: